Case-series · July 29, 2026

Retrospective Case-Series on Chiropractic Care for Back Pain: Outcomes from 100% Chiropractic Murfreesboro

Abstract

Background: Back pain represents a widespread musculoskeletal issue, significantly impacting daily function and quality of life. This case series investigates the effectiveness of chiropractic interventions in reducing back pain and improving mobility. Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted using de-identified patient data from 100% Chiropractic Murfreesboro, focusing on four patients presenting with primary complaints of back pain. Data collected included initial and final pain levels (numerical rating scale) and estimated mobility improvement. Results: Across the four cases, an average pain reduction of 85% (median 85%) was observed, alongside an average mobility improvement of 77% (median 80%). Individual patient experiences included significant back improvement within a few sessions, resolution of pain, and dramatic improvements in daily activity tolerance. Conclusions: The findings suggest that corrective chiropractic care may be an effective intervention for patients experiencing back pain, leading to substantial reductions in pain and improvements in functional mobility. Further research with larger, prospective studies is warranted to validate these observations.

Methods

This study employed a retrospective case-series design, drawing data from de-identified patient records at 100% Chiropractic Murfreesboro, located in Murfreesboro, TN. The intent was to evaluate outcomes for a cohort of patients receiving chiropractic care for back pain. Inclusion criteria for this series stipulated that patients presented with a chief complaint of 'back pain' and had verifiable outcomes documented within their clinical narratives or quantitative assessments at the clinic, which is operated by Dr. Jet Jackson (D.C.) with over 5 years of experience. A total of four patient cases were selected for analysis based on these criteria. Data captured specifically included reported initial and final pain levels, typically assessed on a numerical rating scale (0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain), and subjective or estimated percentages of mobility improvement. Calculations for pain reduction were derived by comparing initial and final pain scores, while mobility improvement percentages were either directly recorded or inferred from patient reports of functional gains. Treatment protocols at 100% Chiropractic Murfreesboro generally involve Corrective Chiropractic Care, complemented by techniques such as Family Wellness Care, Sports Injury Chiropractic, Auto Accident Chiropractic, Massage Therapy, Prenatal Chiropractic, and Pediatric Chiropractic. Due to the retrospective nature and clinic-specific data collection methods, this series primarily relied on patient-reported outcomes and clinical observations. Limitations include the small sample size, which restricts generalizability, and the lack of a control group for comparison. The reliance on retrospectively collected and self-reported metrics also introduces potential for recall bias or subjective interpretation. Furthermore, this study did not capture specific details on treatment frequency or duration beyond general timeframes. All data were de-identified to protect patient privacy prior to analysis.

Discussion

The outcomes observed in this case series from 100% Chiropractic Murfreesboro suggest that corrective chiropractic care may offer significant benefits for individuals suffering from back pain. The average pain reduction of 85% and mobility improvement of 77% within this small cohort are encouraging. These figures indicate that patients under chiropractic care experienced substantial relief from their primary complaint and a notable restoration of physical function. This aligns with general clinical expectations that conservative treatments can effectively manage back pain, particularly mechanical etiologies. The observed improvements, often occurring within a few sessions or several weeks, highlight the potential for relatively rapid clinical response in some individuals. Such rapid alleviation of symptoms can be crucial for patients seeking alternatives to long-term pharmacological management or invasive procedures. The individual case narratives further support these aggregate findings, with patients reporting outcomes ranging from 'significant back improvement' and 'pain essentially resolved' to 'completely resolved my back pain' and 'functional limitations reduced quickly.' These qualitative reports, coupled with quantitative reductions in pain scores and improvements in mobility, underscore the perceived efficacy of the care received. From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that chiropractic interventions at 100% Chiropractic Murfreesboro are positively impacting patient well-being and functional capacity. While this retrospective series is limited, the consistent positive trend across all cases suggests that the protocols employed at this clinic are contributing to favorable patient outcomes regarding back pain. These results provide a basis for further investigation into the specific techniques and patient profiles that yield the most beneficial responses to chiropractic care for back pain.

Limitations

This retrospective case series has several important limitations. Firstly, the small sample size of four cases significantly restricts the generalizability of these findings to a broader population. Secondly, as a single-site study from 100% Chiropractic Murfreesboro, the results may not be representative of outcomes at other chiropractic clinics utilizing different techniques or patient populations. The reliance on retrospectively collected and largely self-reported pain and mobility metrics introduces potential for recall bias or subjective interpretation. Specific treatment protocols and their frequency were not detailed, limiting the ability to draw direct cause-and-effect conclusions. Furthermore, the absence of a control group prevents direct comparison of outcomes against other interventions or no intervention. Lastly, the patient cases were drawn from existing records, which introduces a potential for selection bias, as typically only patients with notable outcomes are featured in such analyses.