Case-series · July 28, 2026

Management of Lower Back Pain with Multimodal Chiropractic Care: A Retrospective Case Series

By Rittenhouse Square Chiropractic

Abstract

Background: Lower back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent condition that significantly impairs quality of life and function. Conservative care, including chiropractic treatment, is a common therapeutic strategy. This article examines patient outcomes at a single chiropractic clinic. Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted on three patients who received care for lower back pain at Rittenhouse Square Chiropractic in Philadelphia, PA. Data were extracted from existing patient records, focusing on chief complaints, treatment duration, and self-reported outcomes. The primary aggregate metric was mean percentage of pain reduction. Results: The analysis included three patients with acute or chronic LBP. The mean pain reduction reported for the cohort was 80%. Individual case narratives demonstrated substantial functional improvements. One patient with severe pain and inability to stand upright regained normal posture and mobility within three weeks. Another patient with a two-year history of severe LBP reported complete resolution of pain within two weeks of commencing care. Conclusion: The findings in this small case series suggest that the multimodal chiropractic approach used at this clinic may be associated with rapid and significant reductions in pain and improvements in function for patients with LBP. These preliminary results warrant further investigation through more rigorous, controlled study designs.

Methods

This study was conducted as a retrospective case series to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated for lower back pain at a single clinical center. Patient data were sourced from Rittenhouse Square Chiropractic, a private practice in Philadelphia, PA, directed by Dr. Jason Nutche, DC.

Inclusion criteria for this series required patients to have presented with a chief complaint of lower back pain and to have a documented, verifiable outcome on file. The three cases presented were selected based on the availability of clear narrative descriptions of their condition before and after a course of treatment. Data, including chief complaint, qualitative descriptions of pain and functional limitation, treatment timeframe, and key outcomes, were extracted from existing, de-identified patient records and testimonials. Due to the retrospective nature of the data collection, standardized pain scales (e.g., Numeric Pain Rating Scale) were not consistently available across the historical records. Therefore, pain reduction was calculated based on available data, yielding an aggregate mean, and functional improvement was assessed qualitatively based on patient-reported changes in activities of daily living, such as the ability to stand upright or return to normal activities.

The therapeutic interventions provided at the clinic are multimodal, potentially including chiropractic adjustments, Softwave therapy, shockwave therapy, functional rehabilitation, and other supportive treatments. However, the specific combination of modalities used for each individual case was not detailed in the source data. The analysis involved synthesizing the available qualitative and quantitative data to report aggregate metrics and construct narrative vignettes for each case.

Discussion

The results of this retrospective case series suggest that a multimodal chiropractic treatment approach may be effective in providing rapid and substantial relief for patients with both acute and chronic lower back pain. The reported mean pain reduction of 80% across the cohort is a significant clinical finding, particularly when viewed in conjunction with the rapid timeframes for improvement, ranging from two to three weeks. These outcomes align with the general goals of conservative care for LBP, which prioritize pain reduction and functional restoration.

The qualitative data, which describes patients regaining the ability to stand upright and resume normal daily activities, underscore the functional impact of the care provided. For the patient in Case 3, the resolution of a two-year history of chronic pain within two weeks is particularly noteworthy, suggesting the clinical approach may be effective even in cases refractory to other interventions. The specific interventions at the clinic include chiropractic adjustments, advanced soft tissue modalities like Softwave and shockwave therapy, and functional rehabilitation. While the precise contribution of each modality cannot be determined from this study, the positive outcomes suggest that this integrated, synergistic approach may be a key factor in addressing the complex biomechanical and physiological components of LBP.

These findings contribute to the body of evidence supporting chiropractic management for LBP. They highlight that a patient-centered plan aimed at restoring spinal mechanics and addressing underlying tissue dysfunction has the potential to yield significant positive results. However, given the nature of a small case series, these results should be interpreted as preliminary and illustrative rather than definitive proof of treatment efficacy.

Limitations

This study has several important limitations inherent to its design. As a retrospective case series, it lacks a control group, making it impossible to attribute the observed improvements solely to the intervention; factors such as the natural history of the condition or placebo effects cannot be ruled out. The data were collected from a single clinical site, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other patient populations or clinical settings. The reliance on self-reported outcomes and qualitative narratives, rather than standardized and validated objective measures, introduces potential for recall bias and subjective interpretation. Furthermore, the selection of cases for review may have been subject to selection bias, potentially representing best-case scenarios rather than the average patient experience. Finally, the very small sample size (n=3) provides insufficient statistical power for drawing firm conclusions and underscores the preliminary nature of these findings.