Case-series · July 29, 2026
Outcomes of Chiropractic Care for Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Case-Series from 100% Chiropractic Gilbert
Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition impacting daily activities and quality of life. This retrospective case-series examines the effectiveness of chiropractic care for LBP at 100% Chiropractic Gilbert. Methods: Data from four de-identified patient cases with LBP, treated between October 2025 and December 2025, were analyzed. Interventions included various chiropractic techniques, therapeutic exercises, and supportive therapies. Pain reduction was quantified using numerical pain scales when available. Results: For the three cases where quantifiable pain metrics were recorded, the mean pain reduction was 88% (median 88%). Qualitative improvements in functional movement, lumbar mobility, and reduction in muscle spasms were consistently observed across cases. One case highlighted resolution of chronic LBP previously unresponsive to other care. Conclusions: Chiropractic care, as delivered at 100% Chiropractic Gilbert, demonstrates significant reductions in low back pain and improvements in functional outcomes for patients presenting with this condition. Further prospective research with larger cohorts is warranted.
Methods
This study is a retrospective case-series examining the effectiveness of chiropractic care for low back pain at 100% Chiropractic Gilbert in Gilbert, AZ. The clinic, owned by Dr. Ty Helfrich (D.C.) and including Dr. Dean Burchenson (D.C.), specializes in corrective chiropractic care, wellness care, sports injury and auto accident recovery, and massage therapy. Inclusion criteria for this study were de-identified patient cases presenting with a primary complaint of low back pain who had completed an initial phase of care or demonstrated significant progress as evidenced by clinic records. Data were collected from four de-identified patient files treated between October 2025 and December 2025. Key metrics captured included baseline and post-treatment pain levels (where available, using a numerical scale), chief complaints, symptoms, duration of care, and specific treatment protocols utilized. Pain reduction percentage was calculated as ([initial pain - final pain] / initial pain) * 100 when numerical values were recorded in the patient file. Mobility improvement was not a consistently tracked quantitative metric across all cases, thus aggregate data for this outcome are not reported. Treatment protocols encompassed a range of chiropractic techniques including Diversified Technique, Thompson Drop Technique, chiropractic adjustments, as well as therapeutic exercises, lumbar range-of-motion stretches, deep tissue therapeutic massage, and other supportive or adjunctive therapies. The primary limitation of this methodology is its retrospective nature, relying on existing clinical documentation. Furthermore, the small sample size and lack of a control group preclude broad generalization of findings.
Discussion
The findings from this retrospective case-series suggest that chiropractic care, as practiced at 100% Chiropractic Gilbert, is associated with substantial improvements in low back pain (LBP) and related functional outcomes. The observed mean pain reduction of 88% (median 88%) across quantified cases is noteworthy and indicates a clinically meaningful effect for the patients included. These outcomes align with general clinical expectations for effective LBP management through conservative, manual therapies, which aim to restore biomechanical function and alleviate symptomatic discomfort. The consistent qualitative improvements in functional movement, lumbar mobility, and reduction of muscle spasms reported across the cases further support the efficacy of the comprehensive care approach. The integration of various chiropractic techniques, therapeutic exercises, and supportive therapies, tailored to individual patient needs, appears to be a crucial aspect of these positive results. The case involving chronic LBP, previously unresponsive to other chiropractic care, underscores the potential for individualized, thorough assessment and treatment to achieve resolution even in complex presentations. While these results are promising, they are derived from a small, single-site dataset and cannot be generalized broadly. However, they provide valuable insight into real-world clinical outcomes in a specific practice setting and suggest that chiropractic care can be a highly effective treatment option for individuals suffering from LBP, including those with chronic or recalcitrant conditions. This information supports the clinical implications that a multi-modal chiropractic approach should be considered for patients with LBP, potentially leading to significant pain relief and improved quality of life.
Limitations
This study is subject to several limitations inherent in its retrospective case-series design. The primary limitation is the small sample size of four cases, which restricts the generalizability of the findings to a broader patient population. Being a single-site study conducted at 100% Chiropractic Gilbert, the results may not be representative of outcomes at other chiropractic clinics or with different provider techniques. The retrospective nature means data were collected from existing patient records, which may lack the standardized, prospective data collection of a controlled trial, leading to potential inconsistencies in metric recording (e.g., absence of quantitative mobility tracking). The reliance on patient-reported pain scores introduces subjectivity and potential recall bias for initial pain levels, although these were assessed at clinic visits. Furthermore, the absence of a control group prevents attributing the observed improvements solely to chiropractic interventions, as natural history or concurrent self-care might have played a role. Finally, selection bias may exist, as specific patient cases were chosen for documentation, potentially highlighting more successful outcomes.