Case-series · July 28, 2026
Chiropractic Management of Back Pain: A Retrospective Case-Series of Four Patients at a Dutch Clinic
By TOPCHIRO Alphen aan den Rijn
Abstract
Background: Back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide, often managed with conservative approaches including chiropractic care. This article examines patient-reported outcomes following chiropractic treatment for back pain. Methods: A retrospective case-series was conducted on four patients treated at TOPCHIRO Alphen aan den Rijn. Data were extracted from existing patient records documenting chief complaint and qualitative outcomes for individuals seeking care for back pain. Results: Quantitative aggregate metrics for pain reduction or mobility improvement were not tracked for this cohort. However, individual case descriptions indicated positive outcomes. All four patients reported improvements in their back pain. One patient was anecdotally able to walk comfortably after three treatments. Another reported a "major improvement" in back pain that had been affecting daily activities, while a third noted their persistent back discomfort felt "much better." The final case reported improvement and highlighted the supportive, professional nature of the care received. Conclusion: The findings from this small case-series suggest that chiropractic care may be a beneficial treatment option for individuals experiencing back pain, leading to patient-reported improvements in comfort and function. Further research with standardized measures and control groups is needed.
Methods
This study was conducted as a retrospective case-series to describe patient outcomes following chiropractic care for back pain at a single clinical center. The data was sourced from existing patient records at TOPCHIRO Alphen aan den Rijn in Alphen aan den Rijn, ZH, Netherlands. Care was provided by Dr. Travis Corcoran and Dr. Gerrit Rautenbach.
The inclusion criterion for this series was any patient who presented to the clinic with a chief complaint of back pain and had a documented, de-identified outcome summary available for review. A total of four patient cases meeting this criterion were included in the analysis.
Data extraction involved collecting qualitative information from pre-existing patient narratives. The collected data points included the chief complaint, a baseline description of the patient's condition, a post-treatment qualitative assessment of their status, and the approximate timeframe of care. No quantitative outcome measures, such as numeric pain rating scales (NPRS), visual analog scales (VAS), or objective range of motion measurements, were available in the source documents. Similarly, specific ICD-10 diagnostic codes and detailed treatment protocols for each case were not provided.
The analysis performed was purely descriptive. The narratives for the four cases were summarized to highlight the patient-reported changes in symptoms and function following the implementation of their chiropractic care plan. Due to the lack of quantitative data, no statistical analysis was performed.
Discussion
This retrospective case-series provides a qualitative overview of the outcomes for four patients treated for back pain at TOPCHIRO Alphen aan den Rijn. The results, while limited, indicate that patients reported positive experiences and symptomatic relief following chiropractic care. The reported outcomes, including comfortable walking, major improvements in pain affecting daily life, and alleviation of persistent discomfort, are consistent with the primary goals of conservative management for musculoskeletal back conditions.
The narratives suggest that the care provided, which included thorough assessments and customized treatment plans, was beneficial for these individuals. The case where a patient was walking comfortably after three sessions points to the potential for relatively rapid functional improvement, a common finding in literature on manual therapy for acute or subacute back pain. The positive feedback on the professional and supportive nature of the clinic underscores the importance of the patient-practitioner relationship in healthcare outcomes, which can influence patient satisfaction, adherence to care, and perceived effectiveness of treatment.
These findings align with general clinical expectations that chiropractic care, through spinal manipulation and associated therapies, can be an effective non-pharmacological option for many types of mechanical back pain. By addressing joint dysfunction and providing patient-centered care, practitioners can help reduce pain and restore function. However, the observations from this series must be interpreted with significant caution. Without a control group, it is impossible to attribute the reported improvements solely to the chiropractic interventions. The natural history of back pain, placebo effects, and regression to the mean are all factors that could have contributed to the positive outcomes.
Limitations
This study has several significant limitations that affect the interpretation and generalizability of its findings. Firstly, the retrospective design is susceptible to information bias, as it relies on data not originally collected for research purposes. Secondly, the very small sample size of four patients means the results cannot be generalized to a larger population of individuals with back pain. Thirdly, the data comes from a single clinic, and the outcomes may be specific to the skills of the practitioners and the patient population they serve. A major limitation is the absence of standardized, quantitative outcome measures; the results are based entirely on qualitative, self-reported narratives, which are subjective and may be influenced by patient expectations. Furthermore, the lack of a control group makes it impossible to determine causality or rule out other factors, such as the natural course of the condition or placebo effects, as responsible for the observed improvements. Finally, there is a high potential for selection bias, as these cases may represent exemplary outcomes rather than a typical or random sample of all patients treated for back pain at the clinic.