Case-series · July 29, 2026
Low Back Pain Management with Chiropractic Care: A Retrospective Case Series from Venice Village Chiropractic
By Venice Village Chiropractic
Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition affecting a significant portion of the global population, often leading to disability and reduced quality of life. This retrospective case series investigates the outcomes of chiropractic interventions for LBP at a private practice. Methods: Data from 20 de-identified patients presenting with LBP at Venice Village Chiropractic were analyzed. Primary outcome measures included numerical pain scale ratings at baseline and post-treatment, with pain reduction percentage calculated. Mobility improvement was not consistently tracked. Results: The series demonstrated a mean pain reduction of 80% (median 81%) across 20 patients. Multiple patients reported significant relief, with some achieving complete resolution of symptoms and returning to full activity, including sports and occupational duties. Conclusions: Chiropractic care at Venice Village Chiropractic appears to be associated with substantial pain reduction in patients with low back pain. While limited by its retrospective, single-center design, these findings support further investigation into the efficacy of chiropractic interventions for LBP.
Methods
This retrospective case series examined patient outcomes for low back pain (LBP) at Venice Village Chiropractic in Venice, FL. Data were collected from the practice's existing records for 20 de-identified patients who received chiropractic care specifically for LBP. The inclusion criteria for this series were adult patients who presented with a chief complaint of LBP, underwent a course of chiropractic treatment facilitated by Dr. Gary Bolen or Dr. Tyler Moyer, and had quantifiable initial and final pain scores. Only verified outcomes documented within the clinic's records were included. Patients were assessed using a numerical pain rating scale (0-10) at their initial consultation and again at the completion of their treatment course, or upon significant improvement. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of pain reduction, calculated as ((initial pain score - final pain score) / initial pain score) * 100%. While mobility improvements were noted anecdotally in patient progress, a standardized, quantifiable metric for mobility improvement was not consistently tracked across all cases and thus could not be aggregated for statistical analysis. Treatment protocols at Venice Village Chiropractic may include, but were not limited to, Non-Surgical Spinal Decompression (DRX 9000), Chiropractic Spinal Correction, Shockwave Therapy, MaxLiving 5 Essentials principles, Nutritional Counseling, Exercise Rehabilitation, Detox Programs, Chiropractic Laser Therapy, and the ChiroThin Weight Loss Program, tailored to individual patient needs. Due to the retrospective nature, specific protocol details for each individual in this de-identified series were not uniformly available for detailed reporting. This study is limited by its retrospective design, relying on existing patient data and lacking a prospective, controlled methodology.
Discussion
The outcomes observed in this retrospective case series suggest that the comprehensive chiropractic care provided at Venice Village Chiropractic is associated with significant pain reduction in patients suffering from low back pain. The mean pain reduction of 80% (median 81%) across 20 patients is noteworthy and compares favorably with general clinical expectations for non-invasive interventions in managing LBP. Many patients exhibited substantial functional improvements, with several achieving complete pain resolution (100% reduction) and successfully resuming demanding activities such as golf, deadlifting, and full-time occupational duties, including warehouse work and desk tasks, within relatively short timeframes ranging from 6 weeks to 4 months. These individual case vignettes underscore the potential for chiropractic intervention to not only alleviate pain but also restore functional capacity and improve quality of life. For example, patients who had chronic pain for years (e.g., Case 3) or failed previous interventions (e.g., Case 11) also experienced considerable relief, indicating the potential efficacy of these interventions even in more challenging presentations. The diversity of presentations, from chronic stiffness to acute severe pain post-trauma, further suggests a broad applicability of the treatment approaches utilized. While specific treatment protocols were tailored to each individual, the consistent positive outcomes imply that the integrated approach adopted by Dr. Bolen and Dr. Moyer, potentially combining techniques like Non-Surgical Spinal Decompression, Chiropractic Spinal Correction, and Exercise Rehabilitation, contributes to these favorable results. These findings, while preliminary, support further exploration of chiropractic care as a valuable component in the management of low back pain.
Limitations
This retrospective case series is subject to several important limitations inherent in its design. Firstly, its retrospective nature means data were collected from existing records, which may not have been standardized for research purposes, potentially leading to incomplete or inconsistent data capture for some variables. Secondly, this study represents a single-site experience at Venice Village Chiropractic, limiting the generalizability of these findings to other clinical settings or patient populations. Thirdly, pain reduction was based on self-reported numerical pain scale ratings, which are subjective and can be influenced by various personal factors. Fourthly, the absence of a control group prevents direct comparison with other interventions or no intervention, making it impossible to definitively attribute improvements solely to the chiropractic care received. Finally, the potential for selection bias exists, as the included cases may represent a subset of patients who achieved particularly favorable outcomes or were more diligent in follow-up, and not all patients treated for LBP at the clinic may be represented in this series.